Have you noticed that the media seems to be far more concerned about Project 2025 than they do about a Donald Trump presidency?
In 2016 the media viciously attacked Trump with such intensity and urgency because they genuinely feared him and what he might accomplish if he won.
Now, the media seems to have effectively resigned itself to the increasingly likely possibility that he might win. They are obviously not pro-Trump, but their ambivalent approach suggests that they don’t believe the stakes are as high this time around.
Perhaps that is because they saw that Trump came and went in the first term without much of anything actually changing.
However the media has lately focused its attention on the Heritage Foundation’s “Project 2025,” which seeks to recruit future White House personnel to execute a more radical agenda than what Trump has promised.
This confirms what I have been saying, which is that the important battles will take place within the Trump Admin over hiring. And like last time it seems probable that we will get a terrible cabinet that will buckle under pressure from the media.
Have you noticed that the media seems to be far more concerned about Project 2025 than they do about a Donald Trump presidency?
In 2016 the media viciously attacked Trump with such intensity and urgency because they genuinely feared him and what he might accomplish if he won.
Now, the media seems to have effectively resigned itself to the increasingly likely possibility that he might win. They are obviously not pro-Trump, but their ambivalent approach suggests that they don’t believe the stakes are as high this time around.
Perhaps that is because they saw that Trump came and went in the first term without much of anything actually changing.
However the media has lately focused its attention on the Heritage Foundation’s “Project 2025,” which seeks to recruit future White House personnel to execute a more radical agenda than what Trump has promised.
This confirms what I have been saying, which is that the important battles will take place within the Trump Admin over hiring. And like last time it seems probable that we will get a terrible cabinet that will buckle under pressure from the media.
BY Nicholas J. Fuentes
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 283
At a time when the Indian stock market is peaking and has rallied immensely compared to global markets, there are companies that have not performed in the last 10 years. These are definitely a minor portion of the market considering there are hundreds of stocks that have turned multibagger since 2020. What went wrong with these stocks? Reasons vary from corporate governance, sectoral weakness, company specific and so on. But the more important question is, are these stocks worth buying?
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
